Huma short essay about Superman II vs. Man of Steel Essays

Jessie Hoang HUMA 1301.208 The optimism of Superman II vs. the x enophobia of Man of Steel Superman is known to be one of the greatest, if not the greatest superhero of all time. However, portraying the live-action version of him, Clark Kent, hasn't been easy. In fact, it has been quite a difficult task that DC films hasn't somewhat mastered. Therefore, Warner Bros. alongside with comic book writers, screenwriters, and directors decided to restart the Superman film series. In 2013, this individualistic character was reintroduced to us with the film named "Man of Steel." However, the discussion has been going on for decades about whether or not this technological-advanced adaptation could potentially overshadow the nostalgic original, Su perman II, with Superman played by the iconic Christopher Reeve. There are several differences between these two Superman movies. However, the biggest difference would definitely be the optimism of Superman II versus the xenophobia of Man of Steel. In 1980, Superman II was successfully released to the worldwide audiences. It featured cutting-edge special effects along with an amazing cast that accurately and splendidly showcased each and every character, leaving the audiences and spectators with a sense of respect and fascination. On the other hand, Man of Steel, directed by Zach Snyder, was another Hollywood megahit released in 2013 that tells a story about everybody's favorite illegal immigrant: Superman. Both of these movies inform us about his native planet, which is the planet Krypton. Unfortunately, this planet is in a huge danger of destruction because its political leaders want to extract the resources out of the core of the planet. Luckily, there is one person that notices and is aware of this approaching circumspection is a scientist as well as Superman's father: Jor-El. Knowing about this alert and how dangerous it is for his son, he embedded Codex, which carries the Kryptonians ' gene pool, int o Superman's body, and sends him to Earth. Coming from different planet makes Superman a foreigner, or even an alien, to the humans on Earth, especially with Codex, Superman is invincible and can only be destroy ed by kryptonite. So how similar Man of Steel and Superman II are? And what is the difference between the two movies if there is any. A lot of fundamentalists have quite a few critics about Man of Steel and how the overall concept of the movie originates from Superman II. Some audiences think that he doesn't fully understand and apprehend the origins of Superman. Some agree that little twists in Man of Steel add a little nice touch to the series, while the others believe that the storyline should stay the same. However, the biggest difference between the two films is the optimism of Superman II versus the xenophobia of Man of Steel. According to Engle, Superman is most American in the display of two identities (assimilated American and proud immigrant), whereas Man of Steel is more xenophobic. In Superman II, people acknowledge Superman as a courageous and powerful individual who helps them fight against the bad guys. It shows how optimistic the movie is trying to portray. In contrast, in Man o f Steel, people view him as a strange foreigner who has superpower that ordinary people could never possess. That is also the reason why people think he might be dangerous to the Earth because superpower can also be very destructive. For example, Jonathan Kent tells his son to be secretive about his power or else the world will fear him. It is not until later o n that they find the good in Superman and finally accept him.